Quantcast
Channel: VICE US
Viewing all 55411 articles
Browse latest View live

German ISIS Supporters Started a Jihadist Social Media Campaign

$
0
0

As ISIS (the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria) brings a horrifying brand of Islamofascism to large parts of Iraq with brutal efficiency, their European supporters are cheering them on to Baghdad with social media, using the kind of meme-based clicktivism that would look more appropriate coming from Facebook environmentalists or Twitter feminists than supporters of murderous extremists.

German ISIS fans created a Facebook campaign in which supporters of the terror group are invited to show their love for the caliphate by writing messages on cardboard signs and uploading them. The campaign, called "One Billion Muslims to Support the Islamic State," is based around a simple premise, as one of the initiators explains:

Just write "One Billion Muslims to Support the Islamic State" on an individually designed piece of cardboard. Add your home country, in this case "Support from Germany," or some trademark of the country... This is an international campaign to thank the lions of our state... So get involved in shaa Allah! May Allah azza wa jall reward you, amin.

This was the initiator's post, complete with what looks like a font that is somehow worse than Comic Sans. The campaign is still very far from its ambitious goal of 1 billion posts, which they are hoping to reach today. Apart from some supporters in France and Austria, I have been unable to find any evidence that the campaign actually went international.

Still, a decent amount of German jihadists took part. Their posts pretty much all included the ISIS logo. Often there would also be Arabic hashtags, like #DawlaIslamiyya or just #Dawla, meaning "the Islamic State," and #Biithnallah, meaning "by God’s will."

While the written content was fairly uniform, German ISIS fans unleashed their creativity to support “their lions.“

Just because it’s a holy war doesn’t mean you can’t throw some color in there, right?

It didn’t take long for the first cute cat to make its appearance. A German lion in a weird glass to support the lions in Mossul. #Adorbs.

There were also jihadist muffins:

ISIS

<3

Other attempts were less impressive.

It’s unclear whether this Austrian included his passport to make the whole thing look more authentic, or whether he’s referring to the ISIS fighters’ habit of destroying their passports upon arrival at the "ground of honor" in Syria or Iraq.

This guy wants to turn Bonn into a Sharia state.

This one was taken by some guys from Hamburg, who sent their kind regards. It reads: "Your brothers from Hamburg support you!"

There are also some jokes about the Shiites, who are currently recruiting their own fighters to stand up to the militant Sunnis of ISIS. Apparently, German jihadists are not impressed—this is what a Shiite fighter looks like, according to the ISIS fan club. The text reads, "The Shiites were ordered to take up weapons against the mujahideen. The mujahideen are also preparing. Poor him, LOL."

So ISIS's German supporters are busy fighting the holy war on the “Heimatfront.“ A holy war that includes launching new Facebook pages, promoting hatred of Shiite Muslims and nonbelievers, and posting images of handwritten jihadist messages on pieces of cardboard.


Smoke DZA Broke Us Off Some Nugs of Knowledge

$
0
0

Illustration by Sofya Levina

Back in 2010, rapper and Harlem native Smoke DZA started the Smokers Club with Jonny Shipes, Steve-O, Shiest Bubz, and Bud Guru. The goal was “to share their love of weed culture and music with the rest of the world.” It was a collective mission to unite potheads across the globe under one roof with good music and better weed. For that first tour in 2010, they brought along budding (at the time) bud-loving rappers like Wiz Khalifa, Dom Kennedy, and Curren$y.

The tour—helmed by Smoke DZA in support of his Substance Abuse, Substance Abuse 1.5: The Headstach, and George Kush Da Button mixtapes—began on the East Coast with crowds of 400. By the time they made it out west, the packed houses had reached 1,200 people. Now, the Smokers Club is a full-fledged community of kush and music lovers around the world complete with a growing list of affiliated rappers, a record label, and a clothing line. If you’re a smoker who’s into rap, or a rapper who’s into smoke, there is a place for you in the Smokers Club.

So it didn’t come as a surprise when Smoke DZA rolled up to our interview in a Jeep Wrangler reeking of green before he even opened the door. Once he did, though, the sun sparkled playfully off of the Bob Marley chain hanging over his Patrick Ewing Knicks jersey, and he took a couple tokes from an almost finished blunt and came to sit next to me on the stoop of his Harlem brownstown.

Smoke DZA’s third and most recent album, Dream.Zone.Achieve—what DZA actually stands for—came out in April, but the day we met, in early May, he was preparing for his album-release show at New York’s SOBs by running errands, shopping at Denim & Supply, and stopping by his jeweler. Although DZA made a name for himself with mixtapes like Rolling Stoned, he claimed that, with this latest release, he’s ready to move on to his next chapter, beyond his weed-smoking persona.

Surrounded by the sweet summery May breeze and overlooking an ice cream truck down the block, it was the perfect day to talk about smoking lots and lots of weed with the self-proclaimed kush god. 

VICE: How does the Smokers Club work?
Smoke DZA: It’s as a hub for all official smokers and potheads around the globe to come party and smoke pot together. Potheads attract good potheads, especially potheads who smoke good weed. Everywhere I go around the world, I got friends that have a particular strain. It wasn’t hard because the cannabis world is so connected. It just happens organically. Weed brings everybody together.

What’s your favorite strain?
OG Kush. It’s more of an indica. I like hard weed and that distinctive taste.

What does it taste like?
It tastes like coffee. OG Kush smells like Folgers. It’s better than coffee.

But does it wake you up?
Yeah, it wakes you up. I do it when I wake up. It puts me right in my zone—that’s the best.

How old were you the first time you smoked?
I might’ve been like 13 the first time I smoked some trash.

Do you remember the first time you got high?
I’ll tell you about the first time I smoked good weed. It was in seventh grade with my man Jose, God rest his soul. He used to live on Audobon Avenue. That’s where all the good weed was back then—all the purple haze and stuff. He used to be like, "Yo, don’t bring none of that porcada"—that’s what they called dirt—"cuz we got the good stuff." I smoked with him at around 9:30 AM, and I was high until 4PM. It was one of those highs where I was riding the bus going home at the end of the day like, Am I ever going to come down? I was panicking because I was going home to my mom’s. That was the first time I smoked good weed.

And the first time you freaked out?
The first time I caught the shakes.

How’d you get over it?
I think I might’ve just ate mad snacks—I had crazy munchies. I went home and ate them off, and I think I might’ve fell asleep, and then I woke up and I was cool.

Where do you get good weed around here now?
I’m the kush god, so the good weed just comes to me. It just grows off the trees. When I touch the tree bark, cannabis flows out to me. It starts budding.

How do you become a kush god?
You become a kush god by knowing what you're smoking, by other people knowing what you smoke, by you smoking nothing but what you say you smoke. That’s the trinity. The three steps.

Where’s the best place to learn about weed?
I educated myself through traveling. I spent a lot of time in LA before I actually was rapping about weed like that. Purple haze and all that shit was on the market, so I’ve seen all types of weed come before my eyes. That’s the best way to learn what’s good and what’s bad.

Is that what you would recommend for other people?
Spend some time in LA and try to go to some dispensaries. Go to Denver, try to get into some dispensaries. Go to San Francisco.

What’s your favorite way to smoke weed?
Well, I’m from New York, so I like smoking in Dutch Masters, and I like smoking in raw papers.

What about spliffs?
Spliffs are a New York thing. Sprinkle a little tobacco on there, and it goes straight to the head and gives you a cleaner way of smoking a blunt. I’m not a real fan of spliffs, but I smoke them from time to time with Dame. Dame Dash smokes spliffs. Harry Fraud smokes spliffs. I might indulge with them every now and then, but it’s not really my thing.

Are you into edibles?
I used to be a big fan of brownies. Me and Jonny Shipes used to bake brownies. We used to let the oil and the weed simmer for a few hours and get that shit nice and right, and then we’d put it in the brownies and mix it all up. But I haven’t ate edibles in a long time. My last trip on brownies wasn’t too good. I drink, but I’m not a big drinker. I don’t like feeling drunk. I ate too many brownies and started to feel a little drunk. The body high started to turn into some other shit that I wasn’t fucking with.

What are your thoughts on legalization?
I think legalization is cool, but I’m more of a fan of decriminalization. I think if it’s decriminalized, then that means anybody can just be smoking weed right here, and you won’t get in trouble—no ticket, no nothing. Legalized is you actually have to get it from somewhere that’s approved. In New York, we don’t have dispensaries, so legalized wouldn’t do anything for us over here. Anyway, they can’t find a way to tax it, so it’ll probably be a little while before New York sees what that’s about.

I hear in Colorado they’re making billions of dollars on weed.
For sure. Colorado has great weed. Colorado is not California, but it’s something.

What will happen to all the drug dealers if it’s legalized?
A lot of people will be out, because that’s the way they’ll make it legal. They’ll get the other guys out. In Harlem, it’s nothing but hustlers out here, so we’ll find a way. We’ll figure it out.

How do you stay motivated when you smoke so much weed?
Smoking weed is like meditation for me. I stay focused because of my grind. I have so many short-term goals that I haven’t accomplished yet. I’m focused on my goals, so the weed don’t really stop me from doing what I got to do if I don’t have my goals accomplished. Plus, other than that, I have a family. I have a wife and kids that I have to provide for, so that always keeps me afloat to actually focus and do what I got to do.

How old are your kids?
I have two five-year-old twins and a ten-year-old son.

Would you smoke with them?
Nah, I don’t even smoke around them. Not right now.

Did you ever smoke with your parents?
By the time I started smoking, my dad stopped smoking.

That’s what you think.
My dad’s a pretty solid guy. We talk about too much for him to lie to me about smoking weed.

Do your parents care that you smoke so much?
They just don’t want me smoking in the street. My mom is like, "You’re not over that, yet? When are you going to be over it?"

But you’re a rapper! What are some of your goals?
One of them that I can say out loud is to score a major deal imprint for my company and all my friends that’s with me. That would be really fucking cool.

Definitely.
A lot of my goals I already accomplished. To be on television more—you might catch me here or there. It’s nothing wrong with Jimmy Fallon, Conan O’Brien, those guys. I’m trying to really get on TV. I want to act. I want to do different things. I’m working on a movie about my life. It’s not actually a documentary. It’s not based on real events, but it’s little parts of real events that I’m trying to tie in. I’m working with Dame on it.

Do you play Smoke DZA in it?
I don’t play Smoke DZA. I’m playing a character.

Are you going to film it in Harlem?
Of course.

Follow Lauren on Twitter.

Bucket Hats, Braids, and Chicken Hearts

$
0
0

Beeline hat, Timberland jacket, Miss Selfridge top, Billionaire Boys Club jeans, Nike socks, Converse sneakers

PHOTOGRAPHY: ANABEL NAVARRO
STYLING: MIRI ESTEBAN
Make-up: Ivory Bella
Hair: Sharmaine Cox
Models: Ayesha at Anti Agency and Heather

Forever 21 jewelery, GAP underwear; Forever 21 jewelery, Monki top, GAP underwear

Forever 21 jewelery, Somewhere Nowhere top

H&M jewelery, Beeline shirt, Somewhere Nowhere belt, Monki T-shirt and skirt, vintage boots

Ice Cream T-shirt

Twenty-Five Years Later, the Central Park Five Are Finally Getting Paid

$
0
0

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio is a pro when it comes to the game of ethnic politics. Photo via Flickr user Diana Robinson

In the spring of 1989, when New York City was still replete with porno theaters and squeegee men and Spike Lee was taking advantage of Rosie Perez in Do The Right Thing, a 28-year-old investment banker at Solomon Brothers was brutally beaten and raped while jogging one night in Central Park. Back then, local tabloids working themselves into a frenzy over some spectacularly grisly crime was a fairly common occurrence, with race never far beneath the surface. Two years earlier, a group of angry white youth had chased a black man to death after his car broke down in what became known as the Howard Beach incident (they forced him into traffic on a busy highway, where he was hit by another car). But this latest outrage really struck a chord, with seemingly every media outlet in the city, from the Village Voice to the New York Times, largely buying the police narrative about the Central Park Five—the black and Hispanic teenagers whom the NYPD had coerced into a confession.

The affair resurfaced in the media in 2002, when District Attorney Robert M. Morgenthau reopened the case and overturned all five convictions after Matias Reyes, an actual monster and serial rapist, admitted to the whole thing. The kids may have committed other felonies that night and even beaten a man—and they seemingly confessed to the rapes on tape—but they did not assault the woman in question, who was beaten within an inch of her life and spent 12 days in a coma.

Of course, by the time the powers that be recognized their mistake, the boys had already served between seven and 13 years in prison. Naturally, the Central Park Five pursued legal action, only to be rebuffed by Michael Bloomberg, Gotham's recently departed billionaire mayor, who staunchly resisted a deal for more than a decade. Now, 25 years after the fact, they are poised for some sweet justice: The city has tentatively agreed to a settlement worth $40 million, it was reported late Thursday, or about $1 million for each year served—well above the national average for exonerations.

In addition to heralding a major upgrade in lifestyle for the not-so-young-anymore men whose lives were upended, the settlement represents a victory for NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio, who had signaled he would reverse the city's stance on a settlement and strike a deal as soon as possible. For a man whose biracial family is a key part of his political identity (and who made reducing racial tension a rather explicit part of his pitch to voters), dishing out some cash and implicitly acknowledging that the NYPD fucked this one up is priceless. After all, this isn't just some obscure historical event but a real miscarriage of justice kept alive in part by a 2012 documentary that Ken Burns made about the case, in collaboration with his daughter Sarah. The settlement will resonate with everyone from the gilded liberals toiling away at investment banks in Manhattan to the projects in the outer boroughs, seemingly confirming de Blasio's commitment to the principle of justice—even if his NYPD commissioner, Bill Bratton, is still doing reactionary stuff like arresting way too many black and Hispanic kids for smoking pot.

It will take more than settling this case and others like it to assuage the concerns of the mayor's supporters about the sprawling reach of New York City's law enforcement regime. But as far as symbolic gestures that also have a tangible impact go—the settlement must first be approved by the city comptroller and a judge—this one stands out. Perhaps the mayor will find a way to milk the moment for all its worth with some kind of public spectacle, given his background as a political strategist who knows how to use acts of theater to connect with liberal-minded urbanites on a visceral level. It's not an economic change like providing universal pre-K to the city's children, but somehow I suspect de Blasio hasn't been riding quite this high since Bill and Hillary Clinton coronated him in January. 

Follow Matt Taylor on Twitter.

'I Never Saw Him Drunk': An Interview with Bukowski’s Longtime Publisher

$
0
0

Bukowski with his wife, Linda. Photo via Getty Images

Regardless of your opinions on Bukowski—whether you think he was a no-talent nihilistic fuck-machine who ran on whores and anything with an ABV, the voice for a generation of postwar blue-collar workers fed up with the factories, or a combination of both—the fact that he is a large figure in Los Angeles’s literary history is undeniable. So a few years back, when we were working on an edition of the magazine devoted to Hollywood called the Showbiz Issue, I decided to reach out to Bukowski’s longtime publisher, John Martin. I wanted to try to cut through the folklore and figure out what the late “poet laureate of sour alleys and dark bars” was like in his daily life.

If there is one man alive who knew the real Charles Bukowski, it is Martin. Bukowski’s publisher for most of his career, Martin is the reason you know who the Buk is and either love or hate him today. In 1965 Martin offered Bukwoski $100 a month, for the rest of his life, to quit his job at the post office and write full-time for the publishing house Black Sparrow. Bukowski delivered, and Martin kept to his word, eventually paying him $10,000 every two weeks. He was the best man at Bukowski’s wedding and represented a source of security in what was often a very unstable life.

In the end, despite getting some great stuff out of Martin (like the quote in the headline of this article), the interview didn’t run in the issue and was shelved for various reasons. Fast-forward to this month, when we published a fashion shoot titled "Bukowski’s Women" featuring a number of nubile young ladies dolled up like characters from the author’s novels. This seemed as good an excuse as any to unearth the interview with Martin, so that’s what we’re doing.

John Martin. Photo via Kurt Rogers/San Francisco Chronicle/Polaris

VICE: Was Bukowski the sole reason you started Black Sparrow?
John Martin: Yes. I started Black Sparrow to publish Charles Bukowski. I’d seen his work in underground magazines, and I just became convinced—almost obsessively—that he was the new Walt Whitman. He was publishing these little tiny eight-, ten-, 12-page chapbooks in editions of 100 with small-press publishers around the country who were basically just his fans—they weren’t really publishers at all. They didn’t make any attempt to distribute his books or anything like that.

In the beginning I had another job that I would work from 7:30 in the morning to 5:00 in the afternoon. Then I’d go home and have dinner with my wife and daughter before going to my Black Sparrow office at 7:00 and working until 12:00 or 1:00 AM. I did that for years. Eventually, around '74, he [Bukowski] had just gotten so big I couldn’t handle it myself, and so I got an assistant and a book-packer.

Tell me about your initial deal with Bukowski. You agreed to give him $100 a month, right?
That’s a great moment in time for me and Bukowski and, I think, for poetry. We sat down with a little piece of paper. I sat there with a pen, and he listed out all of his monthly expenses—and you’ve got to remember, this was 1965, when his rent was $35 a month. He had $15 in child support, $3 for cigarettes, $10 for liquor, and another $15 for food. And yet, even though that sounds pitifully small, at the time he was feeding himself and had nice clothes, drove a very old car, and lived in this completely or partially destroyed unit in East Hollywood. He could get along on $100 a month. I was only earning $400 a month, so I was giving him 25 percent of my income. But as soon as the thing took off we did much better.

At the very end, I paid him a retainer so I wouldn’t owe him some horrible amount of money. Eventually I paid him $10,000 every two weeks. So he went from $100 every month to $10,000 every two weeks, and then, at the end of the year, I’d make up whatever I still owed him. Later, the really big money came in when we started to sell his books for movies and stuff like that.

Were other novels, besides Factotum and Barfly, turned into screenplays?
Yes. They were sold but have never been made. Post Office was sold to Taylor Hackford way back in the early 70s; Ham on Rye was also sold… You’re kinda catching me off the cuff here… Factotum was sold, Women was sold to Paul Verhoeven, and Barfly of course was sold.

Do you think they’re going to make any in the future?
You know what? At this point, I could care less. I wanted to make Bukowski independent, and he died a millionaire. He was very frugal with his money and not at all ostentatious. I remember once I went with him to buy a new car, a BMW.  He walked in with his flannel pants and a flannel shirt and a pen in his breast pocket—he always carried a pin clipped into his breast pocket—and he skulked around until he found the car he wanted. The salespeople wouldn’t even look at him. Finally someone comes over and, in a very kind of sarcastic tone, says, “Can I help you, sir?” And he said, “Yeah, I decided I want this car.”

“Do you want to finance it?” the guy asked.

“No, I’ll give you a check.”

The salesman asked, “Now?” and Bukowski said, “Yes.” The guy was just flabbergasted, but suddenly the coffee and coffeecakes and doughnuts were produced, and soft chairs came out from nowhere. They were all huddled around. He filled out the paperwork, wrote out the check, got in the car, and drove off.

Such a classic story. Was there ever a time when you were skeptical about giving this drunk guy a quarter of your money?
No. Never. I believed in him as much as he believed in himself. It was almost like a religious conversion, where a person can’t be dissuaded. They’re gonna go on that crusade on the back of a mule or whatever, regardless of anything. That’s the way I felt about publishing Bukowski.

How did Bukowski feel about having his books turned into screenplays? It seems like he had mixed feelings about Hollywood.
Well, he makes fun of it in the novel Hollywood, but at the same time he was a guy who, before he went to work for the post office, had slept more than one night on a park bench. He was a guy who had been carted off to die in Los Angeles’s biggest hospital as a charity patient and almost bled to death. He was a guy who had worked—if you read Factotum—in a dog-biscuit factory. He worked nights putting up those little placards in the subway cars, those little advertising placards that you slide into a slot. He worked in a framing shop, framing pictures. I mean, he’d really been through the ringer.

Later, just by the power of his writing, he began to attract interesting and famous people to him, like Elliott Gould, Bono… His biggest fan was Sean Penn—he loved him. They were as close as two men have ever been. And those were sort of the spoils; you know what I mean? In the old days, medieval times, they would sack a city, and then there were the spoils—all the jewelry and artworks and whatever—it belonged to the invading army. He had earned those spoils. Not that he ever looked down on anybody, but I can remember at one point Bono was giving a concert at Dodger Stadium in Los Angeles and invited Bukowski and his wife to be his guests. He started the concert by saying, “This concert is for Charles Bukowksi.” And the crowd cheered! They knew who he was.

What was the Elliott Gould connection?
It’s another famous Bukowski story. Bukowski began to feel ill; he had a temperature and a cough. Gould said, “You’ve gotta see my doctor.” Took him over to Beverly Hills, and the expensive Beverly Hills specialist checked him out and said, “You’re just run down. Take some vitamins and relax for a while.” He kept on having a temperature and a cough, and so Sean Penn took him to his doctor, who was another Beverly Hills specialist. The doctor looked him over and said, “I don’t see anything wrong. You’re just run down. Don’t stay up so late at work,” and that kind of thing. One day one of his cats—Bukowksi was a great cat lover—got hurt in a fight. Bukowksi took it to a veterinarian near where he lived in San Pedro, which is a tough sailor area, and the guy fixed up the cat, bandaged it, and did whatever needed to be done. Bukowski told him, “You know, I’ve been to these two doctors, I feel terrible, I’ve got this cough, this fever...” The guy lookked at him and said, “You’ve got tuberculosis.” The Beverly Hills doctors had never seen a case of tuberculosis! It’s a poor person’s disease. Then this vet—without even taking his temperature—looked at him, listened to his cough, and said, “Well, you’ve got tuberculosis.” So Sean Penn took him back to his doctor, who was thoroughly humiliated, and he was put on a regimen, and within a year he was OK.

I hope that veterinarian got a raise. Going back to those menial jobs, while they sounded like hell at the time, they did end up providing him with a lot of material.
He didn’t hate them as much as he was angry. In other words, a person who hates their job—that’s a small person. That’s a person without any character or self-knowledge. But you can be angry at being forced to go to a job, and that’s what he was, because he wanted to write.

How did his first novel, Post Office, come about?
This is a good story. So we made that deal in December for $100 a month—early December, as I recall—and so he gave notice to the post office, and his last day there was going to be December 31. He said, “OK, I’m going to work for you on January 2, because January 1 is New Year’s Day and I’m going to take that as a holiday. We thought that was really funny. About three or four weeks went by, I think it was still in January, or at worst the first week in February, and he called me—oh, and I had told him earlier, “If you ever think of writing a novel, that’s easier to sell than poetry; it would help if you could write a novel”—so he called me up at the very end of January or the first week of February, out of the blue, and said, “I got it; come and get it.” I said, “What?” And he said, “My novel.” I said, “You’ve written a novel since I saw you last?” And he said, “Yes.” I asked how that was possible, and he said, “Fear can accomplish a lot.” And that novel was Post Office.

Do you think if you had met him when he was younger and offered him money to write full-time, instead of working those jobs that he had to work, that his work would have suffered if he hadn’t had that experience?
You know, everything adds up to what we are, and he needed every bit of what went on prior to becoming successful. It’s like Henry Miller, practically down and out in the streets in Paris. If he hadn’t had that experience, how could he have written Tropic of Cancer? Bukowski hit bottom again and again.  The only stable period in his life after he left home was during the few years that he worked at the post office. Because it was a job to go to every day, he had to be sober, he had to be on time, and yet he was just burning with this desire to write. Remember, he had stopped writing at the end of the 40s and didn’t write for ten years—he was just on a ten-year drunk. And then, in the late 50s, he had the physical collapse, where he ended up in that hospital, bleeding from the rectum. He almost died.

Were you involved in the production of Barfly?
No. All I did was worry.

Why did you worry?
Because when he was surrounded by those people—Hank was not comfortable among people, in a crowd, even at a small gathering; he was a real loner. He wanted to get up in the morning, have a quick breakfast with his wife, read the paper, leave the house about noon, go to the track, come home at 6:00, have dinner about 7:00, go upstairs at 8:00, and write until two in the morning, and he wanted nothing to interfere with that routine. And he did that seven days a week. I mean, we spent time together, and he enjoyed being with Sean Penn, but I knew not to drop in on him every day—he would have hated it. He’d have been polite—he was the most polite man I’ve ever known, and the most honest man I’ve ever known. He was so deferential and polite and so concerned for your comfort, and whether you were happy or not, when you were with him.

That doesn’t always come across in his writing.
[laughs] It doesn’t come across at all. I mean, his public persona is very unlike the man.

How so, besides his being polite?
I knew him for what, 35 years or more? I never saw him drunk. Never once, never.

What? Really? Was he drinking often, just in moderation?
No, I think just the opposite. He was not drinking very often, but when he did he drank a lot. I mean, he drank every day, and toward the end it was good wine. Remember, he lived to write, and just like lots of writers, during the course of writing—say, between 8:00 in the evening and 2:00 in the morning—he would sip wine; it kept him sort of greased.

Bukowski at a screening of 'Barfly,' November 4, 1987. Photo via WireImage

So he was more of a social drinker? He would just have enough to keep him loose throughout the day?
Right. Unless it was like during the filming of Barfly, when he was being invited to cast parties and playing a kind of cameo role in the movie and that sort of thing. He would just drink blindly because he was so frightened. I mean, he was frightened of people.

So just to be clear, you knew him for 35 years but never saw him drunk. 
Well, I met him in ’65, and he died in ’94, so no, about 30 years I knew him—and I never saw him drunk, no.

But when he was hanging out with these Hollywood types he was getting drunk.
Yes, but I wasn’t there. I was living in Santa Barbra. When he started to get really famous—I moved to Santa Barbra in ’75, and that’s when he really—I knew what was coming. I remember once going over there when he was living in this dump in East Hollywood, and he had this little apartment right on the street, ground floor, with a little porch. And on the porch was a couch, a beat-up old couch. I wouldn’t have even sat in it, it looked so dirty. Anyway, I went over to see him, and there, sitting on the couch, were the two most beautiful little blond girls. Small, gracious, tender little girls, you know? I thought, What the hell are they doing here? And so, as I came up the porch, one of them said, “You’re not Bukowski.” And I said, “No, but I’m going to meet him here in about ten or 15 minutes.” And she said, “Oh, we’ve come all the way from Holland to meet him.” I said, “Well, that’s very nice. He’ll be pleased to meet you,” or something lame.  And I said, “That’s an awful long way to come just to meet him.” And they said, “Oh, we want to fuck him.”

They were just that blunt about it, huh?
Yeah. They said they had come all the way from Amsterdam to fuck Charles Bukowski.  

Did he come back and fuck them?
Ah, I doubt it. This was while he was writing Women, or just before. When he got there—I’m thinking about it—we all sat down and talked for about 15, 20 minutes, and when they saw that I wasn’t going to leave, they said, “Well, we’ll come back later,” and he told me they never came back. So I don’t know. They may have come back; he wouldn’t have told me.

Was Women a pretty accurate representation of the way he was living?
Oh, yeah. He wrote that in, like, ‘75, ‘76, ‘77. And I published it in ‘78. He would send me the manuscript chapter by chapter as he finished it, and after each chapter I’d have to sit down and compose myself and hope that it wasn’t all real.

Did you ask him how much of it was real?
I would just call him and say, “Are you OK? Are you behaving yourself?” Because, you know, he was always scrupulously on good behavior when I was around. Let’s face it: I became sort of the exit out of the life he’d had before. I have a thing I treasure framed on my wall. It’s just a piece of white paper, and he’s typed at the top:

Dear Johnny,

You’re the best boss I ever had.

And then a drawing of himself and signed, Henry Chinaski.

That’s great.
And every two weeks he got a check. I mean, I represented stability and hard work—because he knew how hard I was working at my end, and he appreciated it. So it was an ideal relationship. He used to call me up, and in this deep voice he’d say, "Mr. Rolls, this is Mr. Royce."

Is that when the money was starting to come in?
Yes. I used to kid him: "One day you’ll light your cigars with 50-dollar bills." He’d say, "Only 50? What about 100?" And this was a guy who, if he dropped a nickel in the street, would stop, walk over, pick it up, and put it in his pocket. Not that he was tight, because he could be very generous with people, but he was frugal; he knew what it meant to have only 20 or 30 cents in your pocket and be hungry.

Jonathan does not care about your opinions on Bukowski. Follow him on Twitter.

Kids Telling Dirty Jokes: Ruby

$
0
0

Meet Ruby—the type of girl the Tea Party would be happy to have on their side. Yeah, she might look like a doll straight out of an American Girl catalog, but at least she's not afraid to share her thoughts on circumcision and the modern women.

Chatting with the Porn Star Who Wants to Be Toronto's Next Mayor

$
0
0



Is Toronto ready to dump its Ford for a Benz? Photo via Nikki Benz Inc.

The 2014 Toronto mayoral election has attracted enough oddball candidates that it’s making the 2003 California gubernatorial recall look like the pinnacle of democratic integrity (that’s the one in which Arnold Schwarzenegger beat out Larry Flint and Gary Coleman). In case you’re not familiar with the current crop of candidates looking to take Rob Ford’s seat, the options include a white supremacist, a dude who almost made marijuana legal in Canada, the conveniently named Al Gore, one of the geniuses who wrote the classic Toronto anthem “Spadina Bus," and a dread-headed hippie who uncomfortably misappropriates Rastafarian culture.

Toronto’s crowded field of unlikely candidates got a lot more erotic after Nikki Benz, adult-film actress, announced her candidacy last month. Benz is a Torontonian through and through. She grew up in Etobicoke—the home of current mayor Rob Ford—before jetting to Los Angeles in 2004 to seek a fame and fortune by putting P's in her V on camera. Her films like Anal Dream Team and Meet the Fuckers 6 have made her a commercial and critical favorite in the world of porn, resulting in seven Adult Video News award nominations.

Nikki sent the press into a tizzy a few weeks ago when she introduced her Brazzers-backed candidacy with the deliriously clever “Trade in Your Ford for a Benz” campaign slogan—but then she ran into some trouble when the driver’s license she used to register was expired and the city prevented her from registering her official candidacy. She’s in the process of resolving the issue now.

I called Nikki to talk to her about how her professional career prepared her for the role of mayor, whether or not this is a publicity stunt, and why she thinks Rob Ford is great.

VICE: What kind of changes would you bring to Toronto if you were mayor?
Nikki Benz: There are three things I would do or try. First, one of the biggest issues that Toronto has—and I know this because I experienced it last week—is horrible traffic. I want to say it’s just as bad as LA. So one of the things that I would do is work on a new plan to resolve the traffic and expand the subway system and raise funds for the relief line.

Another thing I want to do is bring the adult industry to Toronto. I realize that this is a point where a lot of people tune me out because they think it’s the worst thing possible for the city, while some others are all for it. The only adult industry that exists in Canada right now is Montreal, and they’re not that big—so I feel that if I brought the industry to Toronto, it would create jobs for people and would bring revenue for the city. We could use that money for the subway Relief Line.  

Then another thing I would probably do is lower property taxes and make it more appealing for younger people, like myself, to buy property.

Has there been anything in your professional experience that you think qualifies you for the role?
I’ve been running Nikki Benz Inc. since 2005. It’s a small corporation. I produce content, and I know how to manage finances. I know how to run a business because I am a business owner. Having a business background would be good for the city if I were to become mayor.

Also, my job already involves a lot of public speaking—I make a lot of appearances, whether it be conventions or trade shows—and I’m good at it. I also feel that I'm charismatic. And I am—this is not a sexual innuendo, but it’s going to sound like it—I’m able to handle a big workload. By that I mean I am really busy every day, and I’m able to divide my time between the different projects that I do.

I’m good at having a business. I’m good at money management. Everything that I’ve learned from the adult business I can apply to government. I understand their concern about my lack of political experience, but I’m not going to be running the city alone—I’m going to get a lot of help. But I’m definitely good at knowing what needs to be done.

Also, as an adult star, pretty much everything that you or someone else needs or wants to know about me is already online. There’s never going to be a scandal with me. I get naked for a living. Everything you need to know is already out there.



Nikki outside of Toronto's city hall. Photo via Nikki Benz

What do you say to people that think this is nothing more than a publicity stunt?
Here’s the thing: Of course I’ve gotten a lot of publicity out of this. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again—every politician, including Rob Ford, runs for publicity first and politics second, because we have to get noticed and recognized for the things that we stand for or believe in. And once the people actually pay attention to you, then it’s time to get serious.

What do you think of Rob Ford?
I really hope that his rehab stint turns out to be useful. I do want to say that I think he’s done good for the city. However, he has a problem. He’s an addict, and to truly recover from an addiction takes three to five years. He’s been in rehab for about two months—I don’t think that’s enough time to recover. Still, if I weren’t running, I would vote for Rob Ford.

My only concern for him is that it’s going to go back to such a high-pressure job again that he would relapse and he hasn’t given himself enough time to truly recover from his addiction.

What is it about Rob Ford’s policies that you like? Why would you vote for him?
I like the fact that he is a people person. Everything he promised to do he did. He lowered taxes, and he wants to extend the subway system. At the end of the day, he has been a good mayor. I’m not saying he’s perfect, but he’s done good for the city, and I can definitely respect that.

How does your Jamaican patois accent hold up against Rob’s?
I think he beats me on that one. I’m definitely not that good. I’ve seen a few of those videos—I had to laugh. It was pretty entertaining. I will say this, though: Since he’s been in rehab, the city’s been kind of boring. He sort of livens things up, and the city is boring without him.

Hear, hear. You said you wanted to implement National Masturbation Day as a citywide holiday.
Technically, that was more of a publicity stunt. That would not happen, no. That was more to get your attention. I wanted people to think, Is she for real?

I’m trying to figure that out, myself. If you wanted to leave the voters of Toronto with one thing about you, what would it be?
I am the most honest person actually running. My life story is out there. I have no hidden agenda. I want to run the city.

Follow Jordan on Twitter.

This Week in Racism: There Are Still No Black Emojis

$
0
0

Welcome to another edition of This Week in Racism. I’ll be ranking news stories on a scale of one to RACIST, with “one” being the least racist and “RACIST” being the most racist.

–Emojis—the text icons that have quickly become the most popular communications craze humanity has seen since the Gutenberg Bible—are getting a much-needed update. Sure, when you want to explain to a friend/co-worker/family member that you just painted your nails or saw a giant turd shaped like a pile of ice cream with eyes and a mouth on the sidewalk, that is taken care of. But what about when you need to tell someone that you're against all forms of piracy?

Lucky for you, the emoji update—250 new emjois in all—has finally encapsulated all of human experience in just a few colorful, eye-catching graphics... unless you're a minority.

Despite the repeated demands of non-white text-message enthusiasts all across the world, the emoji update doesn't have a single new brown or black face. There's still the cheerful, young Sikh boy in the turban, who presumably is supposed to stand in for all non-white/non-cartoon yellow humans. Also, there are the gay emojis, which everyone loves and are fantastic. Look at how cute they are! Seriously. I'm into the gay emojis.

The Unicode Consortium, a nonprofit that regulates computer-text-coding standards, has not issued a statement regarding their homogeneous view of humanity. According to a report on Mashabale, Apple, Google, and Microsoft are all members of this shadowy organization (a.k.a. "the Man") keeping the "brother" down. Instead of minority emojis, we got a wide variety of symbols that are sure to be useful in standard, everyday personal communication:

  • Circled Information Source
  • Sleeping Accommodation
  • Very Heavy Reverse Solidus
  • Downwards Rocket
  • South East Pointing Bud
  • Optical Disc Icon
  • Notched Right Semicircle With Three Dots
  • Chipmunk
  • Black Droplet

More than half of these I can't even picture in my mind and sound more like weird sex positions than emoticons. Did you know that famous pop star Sting is so adept at tantric sex that he's mastered the Very Heavy Reverse Solidus? I heard that Richard Gere once shoved a chipmunk up his Circled Information Source.

At least the droplet is black. Also, if you squint, the "No Piracy" emoji kinda looks like a Mexican person with an eyepatch. I suppose life really is all about the small victories. Of course, if you're still mad at the Unicode Consortium, you've got a leg up in expressing your disgust: There's a middle-finger emoji7

–On Wednesday, the US Patent Office canceled the trademark registration for the Washington Redskins football team. In a 2–1 decision, the Patent Office found that the nickname is "disparaging of Native Americans." Trademarks that are found to "disparage or belittle other groups" are not permitted by federal law. This doesn't mean the Redskins have to change their name anytime soon. It just means that the Redskins organization can no longer prevent other people from selling merchandise with the team name on it.

The Redskins' owner, Dan Snyder, has said on numerous occasions that he will never change the name, and former players have lined up in support of his decision. Instead of seeing this as an issue where a racial slur is being used as a team nickname in America's most popular sport, pundits like Rush Limbaugh are blaming this issue on—wait for it—Barack Obama. Hardly anyone takes Rush Limbaugh seriously anymore, but this might be a bigger stretch than when Rush tries to squeeze into his jeans every morning. RACIST

The Most Racist Tweets of the Week:

 

 


Is Congressman Charlie Rangel Still King in Harlem?

$
0
0

Charles Rangel at the 2014 AIDS Walk in New York City. Photo via Flickr user Diana Robinson

In September 1971, New York City Congressman Charles Rangel received a personal phone call from the president, Richard Nixon. Having ousted totemic Harlem political icon Adam Clayton Powell Jr. in the previous year’s Democratic primary, the freshman Rangel expressed his thrill upon Nixon’s extension of congratulations for “concentrating most of his attention on the drug problem,” as the New York Times reported at the time. The “drug problem” then—as now—was heroin, and Rangel proposed several drastic measures to combat the "moral corruption" it allegedly wrought on Manhattan and the Bronx. A former law enforcement official, Rangel went so far as to declare his willingness "to organize a national boycott of all French imports” should the Pompidou government fail to mount a sufficiently aggressive heroin-interdiction effort. You see, Rangel is an eccentric man with a long, weird record, and it is therefore perfectly fitting that he is desperately fending off—for the second time in as many years—an existential threat to his ego and power.

On Thursday, Rangel rode buoyantly on a “caravan” through Upper Manhattan, greeting cheerful locals in neighborhoods he has represented for more than four decades. If he is deposed in the Democratic primary on June 24, it probably won’t owe to some unforeseen popular uprising, as in the case of what evidently propelled little-known economics Professor David Brat to a stunning victory over US House Majority Leader Eric Cantor in Virginia last week. It would rather more likely be because Rangel has forfeited credibility in the eyes of a great many in his own party, especially since the historic censure by the House of Representatives delivered in 2010—the first time that body had taken such action in 27 years.

Rangel defeated State Senator Adriano Espaillat by a mere 1,000 votes in the primary two years ago, and that outcome was marred by widespread allegations of disenfranchisement via myriad sketchy means. This go-round Espaillat is after him again, and there are fresh signs of establishment forces coalescing against Rangel. The New York Times endorsed his opponent, as did El Diario, the city’s biggest Spanish-language publication—not to mention a raft of city politicians, including former comptroller Bill Thompson, along with labor unions, such as United Federation of Teachers. Unsurprisingly, each day brings new allegations of dirty tricks; flyers purportedly aimed at disenfranchising Hispanic voters were attributed to Rangel this week. (Two leading PR operatives for either campaign, James Freedland and Lis Smith, have been relentless to the point of tedium with their constant Twitter sniping.)

All this discord likely could’ve been avoided with but a minor intervention from one New York City figure in particular: the current mayor, Bill de Blasio. Endowed with a reputation for adroit political gamesmanship, de Blasio—a Hillary Clinton campaign operative—surely has taken keen interest in the Rangel-Espaillat race. But he’s stayed conspicuously silent. This would be unremarkable if Rangel were some hopeless novice, but the man has represented Harlem, the mythological center of African American cultural life, continuously since the 1970s. De Blasio has perhaps calculated that Rangel’s career in public life is coming to an end, and it is in his interest to stay publicly noncommittal.

The initial shockwaves of Cantor’s blindsiding defeat were still reverberating last week as Rangel stood before an audience at Lehman College in Northwest Bronx. He could be argued as typifying the very sort of complacent incumbent who’d be wholly indictable under the populist-imbued criteria that toppled Cantor. Both close friends to multitudinous corporate titans, Rangel and Cantor rank highly in their respective parties’ congressional hierarchies and both could be accused with some merit of having neglected local concerns for national political strategizing. Neither have meaningfully embraced economic populism, as Cantor’s vanquisher did, as they are themselves intimately part of the very process by which crony capitalism is generated.

Rangel is also 84 years old. In fact, June 11, the night of the Bronx debate, was his birthday. Espaillat congratulated the Congressman for this in his opening remarks, but Rangel did not acknowledge the birthday wishes. Later that night I asked if constituents of New York’s 13th congressional district could be assured that Rangel maintains the cognitive and physical abilities required to execute the job of Congressman. Rangel quipped in his spectacularly gravelly voice, “If I could only remember my name, I would answer that.” When queried about whether Espaillat had extended the birthday greeting to Rangel right off the bat so as to draw attention to his advanced age, Espaillat spokesperson Chelsea O’Connor wrote, “Of course not. It was a sincere 'happy birthday.'” Capital New York’s Azi Paybarah asked Rangel how it felt standing at the debate podium for an hour; Rangel replied, “It was pretty cool.”  Freedland, who serves as a Rangel spokesman, said his campaign had no plans to release documentation attesting to his physical or mental competence, and after repeated requests did not provide information on Rangel’s most recent professional evaluations.

Still, if Rangel is going down, it will probably have little to do with elderliness. Espaillat has been calling attention to Rangel catering to Wall Street’s wishes in revising the Dodd-Frank financial reform law, and for being insufficiently attuned to the changing political tide in the district. Just as rumblings now swell that Cantor was deposed in part because his unlikely conqueror, David Brat, could resonantly “talk Jesus”—in a way Cantor, as the lone Jewish Republican in Congress, could not—there is similar identitarian chatter of how the now majority-Hispanic district ought to be represented by one of its own. To which the ornery-yet-affable Rangel asked during the June 11 debate, “What the hell does ethnicity have to do with being qualified?” Rangel may have a point here, but whether he’s right or wrong on the merits is of little consequence in a city where ethnic politics are still dominant.

I asked Rangel if he was concerned about an emergent anti-incumbent fervor rustling in the electorate. “No,” he said, “I am concerned, though, that this could mean the destruction of the Republican Party as we know it. It could be that come 2016 there’s only one party. That would be sad for the Nation.”

Rangel continued, “You have a small group of people that are cult-like in their hatred for anyone who sounds any degree of compassion, and when it reaches the point that Cantor is target, it is bad.” Rattling off a list of prominent Republicans whom he deems responsible for this trend—US Senator Ted Cruz, Texas Governor Rick Perry, and now David Brat—Rangel appeared to confuse “Ron Paul” for his son, Senator Rand Paul.

Like Cantor, Rangel is deeply emblematic of the Washington, DC, political establishment and has keenly mastered the art of navigating the machinations of its governing culture. The two men might be favored by different sets of moguls—Rangel’s major financial backers include Miami Heat owner Micky Arison, former Museum of Modern Art president Agnes Gund, casino magnate Steve Wynn, former San Francisco mayor Willie Brown, and BET founder Robert Johnson—but are embedded in fundamentally likeminded social and economic strata.

But at least Rangel’s overt appeal to seniority has a logic to it. 22 terms in Congress yields dividends by way of the ability of a House member to funnel federal dollars into their district. And for an area with such wide swaths of immiserated voters, this has practical import. Why hand over power to a novice—or “trainee,” as Rangel puts it—when you have a pillar of Congress at the helm, a man with longstanding ties to every big-name Democratic power-player under the sun?

Besides, memories of the censure are already appearing to fade. “Hey, I’m 80 years old,” Rangel said at the time in his own defense. “For God’s sake, just don’t believe that I don’t have feelings.”

Whatever else there is to say about him, Rangel certainly remains in top form on the witticism front. Central to his presentation are one-liners and quips, often very funny, to the point of provoking audible laughter from journalists. After a debate last week, Rangel, being guided around the post-debate “spin-room” by handlers to take media questions, at one point faked putting his hands against the wall as if submitting to a police pat-down. The assembled pack of reporters guffawed. After more than four decades, Rangel’s greatest weapons remain his charm and his familiarity, but perhaps this time around he’ll also need to hold out hope that whatever swept through Virginia on Tuesday won’t find its way up to New York.

Follow Michael Tracey on Twitter.

Correction: Because of an editing error, an earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that Public Advocate Letitia James had endorsed Espaillat. In fact, she endorsed Rangel on Friday.

How to Make It in Porn

$
0
0

Screenshot via YouTube.

Markus Waxenegger, a stone-cold Steve Austin look-alike from the Alps, is Austria’s biggest porn export and the star of such classics as Rita and Her Fuckmares, Ass Is a Must, Cum from the Rooftop, and Hotel Fuckmegood (and no, the titles don’t sound less ridiculous in German).

He embodies the Alps like nobody else has done since the days of Arnold Schwarzenegger—and just like his idol, he uses the clichés people hold against stupid and primal strongmen and incorporates them into his gimmick. That’s why he regularly plays a bullying sexual predator with an ever-horny and always abusive agenda who nevertheless never fails to bring joy and happiness to the ladies he forces into having sex with him.

In Waxenegger’s porn universe, “I’ll put a stick up your ass” counts as foreplay, and “Shut up, bitch” is perfectly acceptable pillow talk. When he comes, he roars like a boar, screaming, “You pig!” and giving both male and female spectators something to think about.

In 2012, Waxenegger retired from active porn duty to get involved in some topics he personally cares about. At that point, he had starred in more than 1,500 movies and won multiple awards, such as the German Venus Award and the Erotic Lounge Award for Best Performer. But besides his notorious reputation as an on-screen rapist and his even more notorious lines that earned him the nickname World’s Funniest Porn Star, Waxenegger’s personal passion points do not revolve around porn or even sex. Maybe a bit surprisingly, the one thing on top of his list is animal rights.

I talked to him about his life in and after porn, his thoughts on romance and eating meat as well as Viagra, S&M, and his mom. Oh, and about what it’s like to spit into a gaping asshole. He was the nicest guy I've met in a while and during the interview, he kept his shirt off. I guess you can take the man out of the porn, and so forth.

VICE: You quit your career as a professional porn star in 2012—shortly after the Venus Awards. What are you up to at the moment? 
Markus Waxenegger: I am a trained chef. So I am back working doing that. A lot of people out there don´t know that I am not doing porn flicks anymore. But I made that decision and returned to my “normal” life. On top of that, my mom died of bone-marrow cancer at the end of 2012. That made me want to start all over again.  

Are you satisfied with your job as a chef?
Well, its not bad. Although my long-term goal is to do something in the fitness industry—personal training, for example. I am also working with a company on developing nutritional supplements.

What was the cause of your retirement? Was it the death of your mother?
The death of my mother was one reason. She was never happy with the stuff I did, even though she accepted it. First and foremost, she wanted me to be happy. The main reason why I quit was the way the industry dealt with health issues. I don’t want to take part in this game of Russian roulette anymore. For me, it was always important to arrive and return healthy from the set. This is not the case anymore. A lot of girls will take part in a gang bang with 20 to 30, sometimes even more guys the night before, but don’t get tested and then come to work the next day. It just got too risky for me.

Why do you think the industry changed the way it deals with safe sex?
The internet played a big part in this. Companies work differently nowadays—they don’t earn as much money as they used to. Budgets are limited. That's why the actors have to resort to things like public gang bangs to earn their living. But I can’t accept that my private life has to suffer because of my career. Especially for so little money—it's just not worth it.

Do people in the industry talk openly about HIV?
To be honest, it is not really talked about. The producers would act differently if they took the issue more seriously.  

How do you become a porn star?
I went into the porn industry because I was keen on having sex in front of a camera. I really liked it. The fact it developed into a real job was a coincidence. I actually just wanted to have fun. I was in a relationship that was pretty dysfunctional, and after that I just wanted to live it up.

How was your first scene?
I was unbelievably nervous and nothing worked out. I couldn’t get it up. The pressure to perform was just too high. My producer said that we would try it again in the afternoon. At this point the only people there were the camera guy, the sound guy, and of course the beautiful lady on set. I had not any other distractions. From then on everything worked splendidly. A week later I was shooting in Ibiza. That was really cool.

Sounds good.
It worked to my advantage that I was one of the few porn actors, if not the only one, in Germany that had a fit body. It was something very special, because everyone else looked just average. I was trained and potent.

Would you consider yourself a pioneer in the field of buff porn stallions?
I don’t know. All I can say is that it is still not a given that German male actors are well trained—at least in the hetero sector. In the US or the Czech Republic, that’s very common.

In your movies, you often played the role of the very dominant macho man, who takes what he wants without asking. Does this reflect your personality or did you just play the role?
I often tried to act like myself. Of course you have to play the role that the producer or the director asks you, but after a while I just went with the flow and I didn’t need any directions anymore. I have to say, I do like to just take the woman, but I always made sure that the woman had as much fun as I was did. I am not the kind of person who enjoys being humiliated—I'm more the type of guy who calls the shots.

So porn was fun?
I was able to do a lot of things sexually that I wouldn’t have done in my private life. Things that I wouldn’t even dare to try. Also some of the script don't correspond to real-life experiences. For example, I would never have sex with multiple women in my personal life.

What wouldn’t you have dared to do in private?
Anal sex with a woman. Or fucking multiple chicks in their asses. Sometimes it is even hard to get your own girl to do things like that. You just dip in the finger really quick and that's that. But I am talking about taking a closer look inside and spitting in it and so forth.

Where there any scenes that you didn’t like?
Of course. I mean, I did try a lot of things. I did some S&M stuff. I played the submissive, all chained-up. That totally didn’t feel like my kind of thing. 

How did you manage to keep your boner and even get an orgasm then?
I always concentrated on certain parts of the body. If I, for example, liked the boobs, I focused on them. I also developed quite a good imagination. A lot of people think that you can get rock-hard with the support of certain supplements, but it's not true. You can nibble on a little bit of Viagra, but you won’t get horny just by doing that. 

My experience is, the more practice you get, the more potent you get. Your hormone levels rise, and you are more likely to get off. I perform better sexually when I exercise on a regular basis. You should also never underestimate the importance of a healthy diet. If you eat fries drenched in mayo and ketchup all day and wash it down with beer, then you shouldn’t be surprised if you can't get it up.

Is it important for a porn star to also be an actor?
There are definitely movies for which filming takes a whole day. I think that's the time to flourish as an actor. In conventional films, in which you are in bed within the first five minutes, I could never deliver good acting performances. That's because my brain had sunk down in my pants already.

Screenshot via YouTube.

Do you watch porn yourself?
Yes, I do. I watched it before I started working in porn and for as long as my career lasted. I just try to avoid watching movies made by people I know—that can get awkward. So I watch foreign porn. If I know what the actors are like in their private lives, I don't get turned on.

Do you have any sex advice for our male readers?
Look into her eyes from time to time and try to understand whether she really likes what you are doing. Some guys are too shy to talk about what they want in bed or even talk to women. The question is, why? If I like someone—even if it's the girl at the cash register at the supermarket—I'll try to give her my phone number. One out of ten will actually get back to you. You just have to man up.

Last question—something besides porn: Is it true that you're into animal rights?
This is an important issue. I think it is very sad that a lot of people—too many people—have no respect for the environment. I am also looking at this from a chef´s perspective. It is quite sad how animals can be kept. I have seen a lot of misery in various places. Why do you pet and love a dog but treat pigs and other animals like trash? You don’t have to become a vegetarian. I eat meat, but only in small amounts. Either way, you should still treat the animals with respect. Today's technology has given us the tools to kill animals but not let them suffer.

I've seen cows being mistreated, and heard them crying. They know what is happening, it's horrible. In some slaughterhouses you see cows cut open in half, still alive, hanging from a hook. That's pure torture. I think it is important to help the weaker links. Everyone should have a voice.

Is the Egyptian Government Finally Taking Action Against Sexual Harassment?

$
0
0

All photos by Ines Della Valle; Protesters gather outside the Cairo Opera House.

Whilst thousands of people gathered in Tahrir Square to celebrate the election and inauguration of new President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi earlier this month, numerous women fell victim to violent attacks and gang rapes—something which has become tragically commonplace in Egypt over the past three years.

One victim, a 19-year-old girl, was watched naked and covered in blood on YouTube by 100,000 people, before the video was removed. “It was 5AM as I watched that dreadful video and read about the assaults that occurred in Tahrir the night before,” organizer of the Walk Like an Egyptian Woman rally, Dena El-Shabba, said. “I was furious," the 20-year-old university student continued. "Those atrocities affect the whole of society and that’s why, inspired by the protests organized in India, I decided to organize a rally myself.”

In less than a week 13,000 people signed up to the Walk Like an Egyptian Woman event page on facebook. When the day of the rally came, on June 14, only 300 or so men and women, including journalists, showed up at the Cairo Opera House. The police monitored the protesters, who were holding anti-sexual harassment banners with feminist slogans. Ministry of Interior consent for demos has been mandatory since last November.

Dena el-Shabba

In April 2013, a UN report suggested that 99.3 percent of women and girls are subjected to sexual harassment in Egypt. Two months later, Human Rights Watch reported that 91 women had been raped or sexually assaulted in Tahrir Square during anti-Morsi protests. In March of this year, a Cairo University female student was sexually attacked by tens of her fellow students, allegedly because of her outfit: black trousers and a pink sweater. 

Given all of that, you may be surprised to know that it took until June 5 for Egypt to criminalize sexual harassment. Aggressors can now be sentenced to a minimum six-month jail term and a fine worth 3,000EGP (about $420) with increased penalties for employers and repeat offenders.

“We ask for this law to be enforced on the spot,” said Ashnadelle Hilmy, a pro-Sisi supporter wearing sunglasses, a tight black dress and a pinned Egyptian flag cockade in her hair. As if to show the public they’re taking the new law seriously, the officers securing the event arrested a taxi driver, accused of verbally harassing a girl handing out flyers for the campaign.

The Ministry of Interior has arrested seven men and opened an investigation into three others, for their responsibility into June’s attacks in Tahrir but, as Shabba and many others pointed out, “these people will never be given a punishment proportional to their crimes as long as Article 267 of the Penal Code, concerning rape, doesn’t change.”

The law refers to a rapist as, “whosoever has sexual intercourse with a female without her consent,” but it doesn't cover penetration short of full sex or with things that aren't body parts. Most of the victims of the recent sexual attacks had their bodies violated by hands and sharp blades so roughly that doctors had to stitch up the deep wounds in their genitals. These perpetrators won’t be prosecuted for rape, but for harassment.

19 year-old Sarah Abdelnour

The new harassment law is better than nothing, but people are sceptical. “The law is only a short-term solution adopted by a government which is scared by the reaction of its own people,” 19-year-old Sarah Abdelnour said, with blood-like red paint on her face.

“The state is exploiting the situation,” 34-year-old Akram Ismail from Bread and Freedom Movement added. “For three years women have been attacked in public spaces and no one, except independent organizations like Basma, Operation Anti-Sexual Harassment or Tahrir Bodyguard, said or did anything to help them. It’s ridiculous that all at a sudden they want to appear as the fathers of the nation.”

The government has ignored the pleas from campaigning organizations against sexual harassment and, even now prefers to blame "foreign entities," such as the banned Muslim Brotherhood, rather than admitting that Egypt has a problem. A social issue has been turned into a political one.

Meanwhile, the Ministry of Interior and the police have been an integral part of the problem. They have been involved in sexual abuses since before the Arab Spring. In 2005, women were singled out and groped as protesters were attacked on the staircase of the Journalists’ Syndicate. In 2007 Emad el-Kebaar was sodomised by two police officers. In 2011 a dozen women were forced to undertake "virginity tests" as a form of torture in Tahrir by the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, headed by no less than General—now President—Sisi.

At Saturday's event, the general consensus seemed to be that you can’t fight an endemic problem like sexual harassment in Egypt by imposing new laws while the general culture is still permissive of rape, but that those laws are nevertheless important.

“Sending a clear and strong message from Cairo in the aftermath of the violent attacks in Tahrir is important to spreading awareness throughout small villages and towns across the country,” Ismail stressed, “but it’s not enough. We need a comprehensive and coordinated approach, which includes an effective legislation, national protocols and strategies for all relevant ministries, and consultation with Egyptian women’s rights groups and survivors.”

Follow Eleonora Vio on Twitter.

A Mass Grave Was Discovered in Mexico

$
0
0
A Mass Grave Was Discovered in Mexico

Former Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer Is Stupid Like a Fox

$
0
0

Schweitzer in New York's Times Square promoting Yellowstone National Park. Photo via Flickr user Montana Office of Tourism

In a profile published Wednesday in National Journal magazine, former Montana governor and current Democratic presidential tease Brian Schweitzer remarked that it seemed to him like maybe Eric Cantor was gay:

Don't hold this against me, but I'm going to blurt it out. How do I say this…men in the South, they are a little effeminate. They just have effeminate mannerisms. If you were just a regular person, you turned on the TV, and you saw Eric Cantor talking, I would say—and I'm fine with gay people, that's all right—but my gaydar is 60-70 percent. But he's not, I think, so I don't know. Again, I couldn't care less. I'm accepting.

Cantor’s wife could not be reached for comment. Although Schweitzer made it clear that he accepts the outgoing House Majority Leader’s probable homosexuality, and even though he specifically asked them not to, the national press is still holding this one against him.

At the Los Angeles Times, Noah Remnick complained that “this kind of commentary isn’t folksy—it’s bigoted.” The Washington Post's Aaron Blake declared the end of Schweitzer’s unannounced bid for the White House, writing, “Anybody with illusions that Schweitzer could be a major player in the 2016 presidential race should probably re-evaluate themselves.” That’s how bad his gaffe was: you should re-evaluate not just your election picks, but your very self.

Don’t be too hard on yourself, though. Democrats can be forgiven for getting excited about Schweitzer, a center-left governor who enjoyed success and popularity in a very red state. He’s smart but still personable, articulate but still casual—sometimes a little too casual, as we saw this week—and his last name is neither Bush nor Clinton. In a denuded political landscape, he seemed like a viable candidate.

I would like to agree with Blake’s belief that voters in 2016 will remember a dumb thing Schweitzer said two years earlier in National Journal, because it shows a commendable faith in the electorate. But it’s possible that this bolo tie-wearing, chainsaw-wielding, perpetually smiling woodchuck has not seen the end of his career just yet.

It’s also possible that in his bonehead remarks, national commenters are getting their first good look at the hypnotic weirdness of Montana politics. Schweitzer’s comments reflect two key features of electoral politics in Big Sky Country: that just-folks attitude, and the tin ear you get from being the only folks you know.

Before we go any further, let us agree that Schweitzer’s comments were incredibly dumb. Even putting aside decades of progress in queer rights and the centuries of brutal repression that preceded them, the surprise resignation of the House Majority Leader is not the occasion to tell National Journal that he seems gay to you. At 60%, Schweitzer’s gaydar might seem accurate enough to speculate about the sexuality of public figures in the national press, but he probably should have restrained himself anyway. Ask any city councilman, much less a governor with presidential ambitions, and he’ll tell you that was a stupid thing to say.

But Schweitzer is stupid like a fox. What he said keeps getting crazier as you read it, but it is also a distillation of the strategy that brought him where he is today. He is a master at appealing to moderate voters in both parties who identify themselves as ordinary folks. Schweitzer’s apparently dumb remarks reflect his years of experience triangulating a divided state electorate, as well as his inexperience doing the same thing on a national scale.

Let’s start with the South. Montanans relentlessly deride the South and those (white) people who live in it, which is weird because to my midwestern eye, they are exactly the same. Both populations are broadly conservative with pockets of intense liberalism. Both are poor with pockets of industrial and agricultural wealth. And both Montanans and southerners place a high premium on rural individualism, whether they actually live that lifestyle or not.

At the beginning of the National Journal profile, MSNBC can’t get its camera truck under the post-and-lintel gate at the entrance to Schweitzer’s ranch, so he cuts it down with a chainsaw. That is insane behavior. Safety aside, after the camera crew is gone, the former governor might look at the ruined timbers of his old-timey gate and wonder if he acted impulsively. But like George W. Bush cutting brush for reporters in Crawford, Texas, Schweitzer is on the lookout for opportunities to be an ordinary person, a good old boy, just folks like you.

It’s a skill he learned by necessity. Schweitzer served eight years as the Democratic governor of a very conservative place, winning by four points in the 2004 election and then by 32 points in 2008. To appreciate the magnitude of that achievement, consider that the Montana House hasn’t seen a Democratic majority since 1991.

A Democrat cannot become governor of Montana based on his policies. A Republican has a hard time doing it, too. The Montana electorate is so strangely polarized, such a bizarre mix of social conservatives and freakout libertarians—plus hippies and backwoods hermits and other people who own their own water supplies—that you’re much more likely to get elected based on who you are than on what you propose to do.

Schweitzer has mastered the art of convincing moderates and low-commitment voters in both parties that he is someone like them. In this week’s comments, he put this skill on display.

To political writers at the LA Times and the Washington Post—as well as to those of us who understand gay identity as something other than a fun new thing straight people can talk about—“gaydar” is offensive. But to your mother and the ladies at her office, to the farmer who is beginning to suspect that it doesn’t matter if two dudes get married, talking about how you have a sixth sense that helps you recognize the gay people in your life is a safe way to embrace a new idea.

Brian Schweitzer has built his career on being a safe way for ordinary people to embrace new ideas. As governor of Montana, he made his progressive agenda safe for lifelong conservatives by wearing a bolo tie and swinging a chainsaw around. He did it by goshing and shucksing his way through every TV appearance he could get. He is a student of that political compromise which seeks out not common policies, but a common sense of who the good guys are.

In the South, politicians do that with religion. If there is one difference between Montana and Kentucky, though, it is that Montanans are not so churchy. Where the South has deacons, Montana has ranchers—candidates who embody the ordinary voter’s sense of himself as a classic individualist, someone who is more loyal to his way of life than to either party, more guided by his intuitive values than any political theory.

In short: rubes. Schweitzer’s gaydar schtick is offensive to those of us who follow politics and language closely, because it represents a step backwards in our understanding of gay people. In the time-honored practice of playing to the rubes, however, it’s a step forward.

Schweitzer inappropriately joked about the outgoing House Majority Leader’s sexuality at the worst moment possible. He associated male homosexuality with effeminacy, and he did it using the hackneyed concept of “gaydar,” itself a way for straight people to express their homophobia while pretending to be supportive. But in the 2016 election, the choice would not be between thinking like that and thinking the way we do. The choice would be between Schweitzer’s brand of dopey, chauvinistic tolerance and the Republican Party.

The hardcore homophobes and the libertine VICE readers have already staked out their positions. It’s the dazed, flabby middle that could go either way. Those are the people Schweitzer is trying to bring with him, and he intends to lead them from the middle.

The former governor of Montana said a dumb thing to the National Journal, but he may have said something useful to a broader, less engaged swath of the American people. On Wednesday, he sent the same message he’s been sending his whole career: I’m just like you, and we could both be a little better.

Dan Brooks lives in a rocket-powered supertruck in America, and writes about politics, culture and lying at his blog, Combat! Follow him on Twitter.

Scott Walker Is a Hero

$
0
0
 
There was a big development in the Republican Party’s shadow primary this week, with the news that Governor Scott Walker of Wisconsin is under investigation for running a “criminal scheme” to dodge campaign-finance laws. According to court documents unsealed Thursday, state prosecutors believe that Walker and his political team illegally coordinated a political spending spree among conservative groups during Wisconsin’s 2011–2012 recall elections, shuffling millions of dollars through a network of nonprofits, some of which appear to have just been shells set up to take in unlimited secret donations. 
 
The allegations make Walker the second Republican governor accused of being a criminal this year. But really, he and his campaign have challenged one of the big absurdities about campaign-finance laws in the post–Citizens United era. While there are still regulations on donations to candidates, there are no such limits for outside spending groups, as long as they’re not directly working for the campaign. This is obviously a false distinction. The Walker campaign just stopped keeping up pretenses, realizing that it is much more efficient for everyone to just work together. 
 
“The evidence shows an extensive coordination scheme that pervaded nearly every aspect of the campaign activities during the historic 2011 and 2012 Wisconsin Senate and Gubernatorial recall elections,” special prosecutor Francis Schmitz wrote in a December motion made public yesterday. The motion goes on to quote an email that Walker sent to GOP mastermind Karl Rove explaining that his campaign adviser R. J. Johnson was orchestrating the expenditures: 
 
“Bottom-line: R. J. helps keep in place a team that is wildly successful in Wisconsin. We are running 9 recall elections and it will be like 9 congressional markets in every market in the state (and Twin Cities)," Walker wrote.
 
Prosecutors argue that this was all an illegal scheme to violate campaign-finance rules against direct coordination between candidates and outside political groups. “No court has ever recognized that secret, coordinated activity resulting in 'undisclosed' contributions to candidates' campaigns and used to circumvent campaign finance laws is protected by the First Amendment,” Schmitz wrote. “Accordingly, the purpose of this investigation is to ensure the integrity of the electoral process in Wisconsin.” 
 
That Walker would try to dismantle the remaining barriers steming the flow of dark money into politics is not surprising. Walker, you may recall, is the guy who, in 2011, asked a prank caller pretending to be one of the Koch brothers to help out state lawmakers who had voted for his bill to undo collective bargaining for public-sector unions. His gubernatorial record rubs all of the right wing’s erogenous zones: tax cuts, abortion restrictions, “traditional marriage,” et al. In the wake of Christie’s Bridgegate collapse, Walker has emerged as a 2016 front-runner, a consensus candidate who can unite the Tea Party base with the GOP Establishment. That didn't happen by accident.
 
For Democrats, the news was an early Christmas present, playing right into the argument that Republicans are pawns of the Koch brothers and other shady interest groups. “At this point, Scott Walker should be more concerned about losing his re-election in Wisconsin than any national ambitions,” said Gwen Rocco, communications director for American Bridge, a Democratic super PAC. “Between the spiraling scandals plaguing Walker and Christie and their respective floundering economies, any notion that the GOP's darling governors would save the party's 2016 hopes should be dead."
 
Melissa Baldauff, a spokeswoman for the Wisconsin Democratic Party, played it a little more cool. “I think the allegation by prosecutors that Scott Walker was at the center of an expansive criminal scheme speaks for itself,” she said in an interview. 
 
Politics aside, the real question here is whether coordinated political spending between campaigns and outside groups is actually illegal, or whether federal judges will rule that, like independent expenditures, it is protected by the First Amendment. Since the court documents were made public Thursday, Walker and other conservatives have hit back hard against the argument that the campaign spending coordination was illegal, arguing that the investigation is just a political witch hunt aimed at derailing his 2014 gubernatorial reelection campaign. “No charges, case over,” the governor said in an interview with Fox & Friends Friday morning. 
 
Walker points out, correctly, that two judges have already ruled in favor of the latter and halted the investigation into the recall campaign. Prosecutors appealed the case and have asked the Seventh Circuit Court to reverse the earlier ruling. “It still remains to be seen what the appeals court judges will rule on the question of whether this was protected by the First Amendment,” said Donald Downs, a professor of political science and law and the University of Wisconsin-Madison. 
 
“If they court reverses the earlier opinion and says that the campaign coordination isn’t protected free speech, this is going to end up in the Supreme Court,” Downs added. “And believe me, they’ll take it. They’re very hot on these issues right now.”

There Will Always Be Value in an App That Saves You Time

$
0
0
There Will Always Be Value in an App That Saves You Time

Black British Musical Identity Is Being Erased by Cultureless Dance Music

$
0
0
Black British Musical Identity Is Being Erased by Cultureless Dance Music

Pat Kennedy Warns of Devil Weed Taking Over America

$
0
0

Patrick Kennedy saying something while using his hands to make a point at a Senate hearing in November 2013. Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

“This is just the beginning,” former congressman Patrick Kennedy said, voice heavy with concern and nasally New England vowels. “Is this the kind of country we want?”

Kennedy was pointing to a picture of a jar of Nugtella, a weed-laced hazelnut spread that High Times has described as “mind-bending happiness.”

“Yes,” I thought, imagining Nugtella on waffles. “Sweet Jesus, yes.”

The majority of the rest of the audience probably did not agree with my vision of America.

In a congressional briefing Thursday sponsored by the Friends of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Kennedy and a pair of scientists briefed a standing-room crowd on recent social trends in Colorado, where citizens voted to legalize weed.

“My biggest worry is commercialization,” Kennedy said as he flipped through slides on his Powerpoint presentation that showed pot advertisements in Denver newspapers for such pot strains “grape ape.” “It’s all about the marketing. Who are they ultimately going to be after? Kids.”

Kennedy’s question, of whether this is the country we want, echoed comments by other politicians this year as support for legalization has continued to grow.

"If there's advertising and legitimacy, how many people can get stoned and still have a great state or a great nation?" Democratic California Gov. Jerry Brown said on Meet the Press in January. "The world's pretty dangerous, very competitive. I think we need to stay alert, if not 24 hours a day, more than some of the potheads might be able to put together."

“See if you want to live in a major city in Colorado where there’s head shops popping up on every corner and people flying into your airport just to come and get high,” Republican New Jersey Gov. Christie said on a local radio show in April. “To me, it’s just not the quality of life we want to have here in the state of New Jersey, and there’s no tax revenue that’s worth that.”

Decline and decadence—is the USA that appeared in Mitt Romney campaign ads possible if we’re all smoking trees?

Since leaving Congress, Kennedy co-founded Smart Approaches to Marijuana (SAM). The group bills itself as “a coalition of professionals working for balanced, sensible policies that aim to reduce marijuana use.”

Kennedy was joined by William Compton, the deputy director of NIDA, and Robert Booth, a professor of psychology at the University of Colorado.

Rep. John Fleming (R., La.) introduced the event. Fleming, who is also a doctor, is one of the more vocal opponents of legalization in the House. “My concern today is, are we making bad laws to, in fact, respond to mythology?” Fleming told the crowd. “We're assuming things that really aren't true.”

Part of the main contention of SAM, NIDA, and legislators like Fleming is that the public debate over weed legalization is light on science. The presenters alluded often to “the facts,” clinging to the phrase like a talisman.

Fleming used his time to highlight seven “marijuana myths,” such as the idea that weed in non-addictive or medicinal.

“Folks, I’m a physician,” Fleming said. “I can tell you with the possible exception of people who have terminal illnesses and who might be in extreme pain, there is no medicinal value to marijuana. I looked at the data. I’ve talked to the organizations.”

Fleming went on to try and dispel other “myths” such as “this whole notion of prisons filled with marijuana users who’ve broken no other law.”

“I talk to law enforcement all the time, and they reassure me that there are people who are marijuana users who, that may be part of their arrest records, but they’re behind bars for other reasons.”

What is apparent listening to speakers like Kennedy and Fleming is that the recent trends in public support for marijuana decriminalization and legalization have put them on their heels.

And at this point, the majority of the American public does not believe smoking a joint will lead you to become a heroin addict, shoot your friend in the face, or provide material support to al Qaeda. You might end up listening to Miles Davis with some beatniks, but you probably won't murder your new friends in a fit of reefer madness.

The choom gang suddenly has lobbyists, two states worth of territory, and a former member at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

Facing these problems, Kennedy, Christie, Jerry Brown, et al, have taken a more society-wide tack in their arguments.

For example, Compton cited two New Zealand studies that showed long-term marijuana users had lower IQs over time and worse social outcomes than their peers.

After Compton, professor Robert Booth shared the results of a long-term, longitudinal study on registered medical marijuana users in Colorado, conducted before full legalization went into effect.

Compton and Booth’s presentations were heavy on data points, more measured in tone, and as a result much more effective than Fleming’s and Kennedy’s.

“I have no financial interests or conflicts,” Booth began. “However, in the spirit of transparency, I will tell you I went to the University of California at Berkeley in the 60s.”

Among Booth’s more interesting data points: 86 percent of registered users in Colorado reported driving while high, and 95 percent reported having sex while high.

Meanwhile, Booth said alcohol and cigarette use has been trending down among 12th graders nationally over the past decade, but marijuana use began trending up around 2006. In Colorado, those numbers are above the national average, and suspensions and expulsions at high schools for drugs are at an all-time high.

These are issues that will no doubt have to be grappled with, but Kennedy and crew have to make their argument in the face of a drug war that costs an estimated $13.7 billion a year, and where drug offenders make up half of the federal prison population.

Kennedy doesn’t deny the gross problems with the current criminal justice system, and it’s hard to disagree with him when he says things like, “We must interrupt the cycle of addiction before people end up in the criminal justice system.”

However, Kennedy said problems like racial disparity and draconian sentencing guidelines are not directly related to weed prohibition.

“We need to address criminal justice and sentencing reform, but a lot of people have used that as an excuse to push legalization,” Kennedy said. “That’s conflating two separate issues.”

Sitting in the audience for the briefing was Howard “Cowboy” Wooldridge, a retired police detective and the co-founder of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP). Dressed in a cowboy hat and a big belt buckle, Wooldridge shook his head and muttered under his breath while Fleming and Kennedy spoke.

When the Q&A session began, Wooldridge rose from his seat. “What advantages do you see to prohibition?” Woolridge asked at the end of a long streak of declarative sentences about the ill effects of the drug war.

“If we’re using your approach, we should legalize heroin, crystal meth, and cocaine,” Kennedy replied.

“They’re less dangerous than alcohol,” Woolridge shot back.

The two circled around each other’s arguments for a minute or so before a cease-fire was reached. It’s an old argument most of us have heard hashed out dozens of times in college dorm rooms and high school debates. But in the halls of Congress, no one’s seen a dead horse that didn’t deserve a beating.

After the briefing, I talked to Wooldridge. He’s a familiar face in DC. As his business card declares, he’s the “police voice on Capitol Hill in opposition to drug prohibition.”

“I’m not denying marijuana is a serious drug,” Wooldridge said. “But cops are missing pedophiles and sex traffickers because we’re spending thousands of hours chasing a green plant.”

The thing that must chafe anti-pot groups is most people these days find the guy in the cowboy hat more convincing than a former congressman from America’s biggest political dynasty.

Follow CJ Ciaramella on Twitter.

Australia Investigates Horrific Abuse of Over 200 Teenage Boys at a Naval Base

$
0
0
Australia Investigates Horrific Abuse of Over 200 Teenage Boys at a Naval Base

Kate Durbin Talks About the Barbaric and Disturbing Art of Reality TV

$
0
0

All photos of Kate Durbin at her reading by Emily Raw

It’s a rainy Saturday night and the Bushwick, Brooklyn gallery is filled for a reading by LA-based performance artist, writer, and underground style icon Kate Durbin. We’re here for Durbin’s new book, E! Entertainment, a poetic annotation of reality TV shows; it's got a magic-eye cover and pink pages and is sectioned into eight “channels,” experimental chapters with titles like “Lindsay’s Necklace Trial,” “Kim’s Fairytale Wedding,” “Wives Shows,” and “Anna Nicole Show.”

During the performance, Durbin recruits audience members to play the “Real Housewives of Beverly Hills,” a participation tactic that is surprisingly successful given how wallflowery reading attendees tend to be. She reads the Kim Kardashian story in celebration of Kim's recent wedding to Kanye West and ends the evening with a chilling transcript from the Anna Nicole Smith “clown video.” As she reads as Anna, Howard, and the doll Anna mistakes for her child, an assistant paints Durbin in clown makeup.

“I’m happy to sign your books, if you aren’t scared of me,” she says afterward.

Pulling from pop culture is a theme for Durbin, whose previous book of poetry, Ravenous Audience, culled scenes from Catherine Breillat films. Other projects she’s undertaken, like Women as Objects (a Tumblr that collected and reblogged the art and writing of teenage girls) and Gaga Stigmata (a blog that collects academic writing about Lady Gaga), have similarly recycled imagery to internet acclaim.

I spoke to Durbin and discussed how an outfit can say the same thing as a poem and how reality TV serves an ancient and barbaric function in society.

VICE: So I read E! as sort of a reclaiming of “trashy” television with the idea that while reality television is often written off as “lowbrow,” it actually uses techniques of classic literature.
Kate Durbin: Yeah! So on all TV shows there are archetypes and conflicts from classic mythology or Shakespeare comedies and tragedies—yet when this happens on reality TV we tend to denigrate the crises. I conclude that this dismissal is about who is having the crisis.

Yes, and your book centers on the stars of “girl culture” or maybe “queer culture”—Kim Kardashian, Anna Nicole Smith, Lindsay Lohan, the Real Housewives. These female “reality TV” stars seem especially mocked.
Yeah, and watching them, I also started to notice how the shows sort of set us up to mock the stars. There’s sometimes this dark undertone that reminds me of the Roman forum.

We do this scapegoating ritual with celebrities that feels almost ancient, barbaric. We build these people up to destroy them; we love to blame celebrities for the evils of society instead of looking at ourselves. They are these sort of beautiful mirrors that we can look into when we don’t want to look at ourselves.

Yeah, it strikes me that celebrities can become like human sacrifices… Marilyn Monroe is a big example.
And after they are sacrificed we reward them with eternal life. Marilyn Monroe is much more powerful than she ever was when she was alive. It’s so twisted that we do this, and I don’t think it’s even removed from what we do to the environment and the wars that we fight. It’s all tied together.

Reading E! I was thinking about how on reality TV there’s a double narrative. You have the narrative of what’s happening on screen with Kim Kardashian and Kris Humphries, and then the narrative of what the audience thinks is really happening. I thought your decision in the book to turn Humphries into TV static showed that, as I think the audience sees him as a fake TV-screen husband.
It was an intuitive choice. I kept thinking about that literary idea of the static character, who doesn’t change. I find it interesting that in reality TV the characters don’t change, which doesn’t actually bother me.

There’s a lot of policing of femininity in these shows. The distance in your writing gave this an almost anthropological angle. As though the book was saying: “These are the circumstances of being a woman in the public eye,” which made it feminist.
I was worried people might not think this was a feminist project because there’s no authorial voice coming in and saying, “Oh these shows are terrible,” but I think the best works of art, including feminist art, are not didactic. I had to create something that could maybe be interpreted both ways in order for it to be potent.

While I find a lot of reality TV disturbing, I’m not totally cynical about the shows. I feel like the women in the shows have real friendships. People always talk about the shallowness of these shows but I’ve always felt that maybe I’m also shallow in certain ways. So what?

Heidi Montag blurbed the book and I know you talked to Spencer and Heidi about the idea of reality television as art.
Heidi and Spencer are interesting. They've done conceptual projects within reality television. They worked with University of California while on Big Brother, and pretended that Spencer lost his phone and that it was then found by a poet who was tweeting poetry and weird stuff from England. In reality it was an electronic literature project, collaborating with U of C.

You know, it really isn’t just a double narrative, sometimes there’s triple or even quadruple narrative on reality TV. But really that’s how we all live now with the wealth of information and technology that surrounds us at all times. Reality TV is very much a medium of this moment, so not to think of it as artistic, or to have the potential for art, just seems blind.

Ann Hirsch, who does performance art by going on reality shows, is a great example of someone that realizes this potential for art. There’s also Josh Harris, who did We Live in Public, which was like pre–Real World underground bunker in New York City full of artists that he filmed invasively 24/7 for an internet television station. That was really the beginning of reality TV, and the fact that this started in the art world is pretty cool.

And now you have Kim getting married on TV, her mom getting a facelift on TV, her sister literally pulling a child from her womb. It all aligns with this idea from the art world of “life as a performance.”
Definitely, it’s the same thing… just more makeup.

I’m curious if this is part of your practice as a writer and artist. Seeing one’s whole existence as a body of work with certain standards…
I do. For this project, I was watching reality TV like any person does and it turned into an artistic practice. I don’t believe in guilty pleasures and I don’t believe in having parts of my life that I don’t encounter fully. I am always trying to integrate the various aspects of my life together for art.

Why should I feel guilty for watching reality TV and why should any part of my life, even the most mundane part of it, such as watching TV, not become a work of art?

You are also such an underground style icon. Do you feel your style says the same thing that your poems or performances do?
Absolutely. I went to Christian schools with strict dress codes growing up, so I always knew fashion was political. I’ve always tried to literally embody ideas that are important to me. People don’t realize that they can do that, embody your work in this medium, and I just wish more people did because it would just be so interesting to encounter people in that way all of the time.

My next project is going to be about what men desire and so I’m going to have to come up with a new way of dressing that is more enticing; my style is very whimsical and strange, so I’m not sure yet how I will marry the two.

I watched “Kim’s Fairytale Wedding” after reading your story and I’m left still questioning all the narratives. They made money from the wedding? How real was the relationship?
What I hope people will take away from reading my book is how much we do these things too. How often do we go to weddings and say, “OK, why are these people getting married?” It can be romantic, of course, but marriage has always been a double narrative. It’s about power, assets, money. Maybe I’m a cynical divorce-type person but I loved that it was called “Kim’s Fairytale Wedding” and it was such a disaster. They were fighting, and yet it was still beautiful in moments and then it didn’t last. I just thought, That’s life.

One of the things we are always asking about reality TV is, “Is this fake or real?” We can’t decide and one of the reasons is because life is complicated. With Kim and Kanye, it’s been a great business merger for them but what’s wrong with that? They do seem to love each other, and finally she’s found someone who is smart enough for her.

So in your work is this theme of mirroring or recycling, taking other pieces of media and reusing them, it feels like a theme or device of the age.
For me to be an artist in this moment it feels right to me to work this way rather than create something new. It definitely feels like we have so much already. 

Rachel Rabbit White is a writer and journalist whose work has appeared in Playboy, The New York Observer, T: The New York Times Style Magazine, Jezebel, Cosmopolitan, and more. 

VICE News: VICE News Capsule

$
0
0

The VICE News Capsule is a news roundup that looks beyond the headlines. This week, nearly 100,000 people flee Pakistan's North Waziristan as the military steps up its anti-Taliban offensive, the Ukrainian government publicizes its efforts to root out Russian spies, hundreds of Albanian police officers raid a pot operation, and SpaceX tests a new feature on a reusable rocket.

Viewing all 55411 articles
Browse latest View live